nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP over SONET considered harmful?
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () Stupi SE>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 98 18:45:23 MET
As great as POS is, and as exciting as running IP on optical OC-48 onto WDM gear sounds (no piece of cake, believe me...)
It is a pice of cake, just belive me.
there is STILL room for ATM. More than just the much-touted network traffic engineering value, too.
This is not a pice of cake. -Peter
Current thread:
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful?, (continued)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Paul Ferguson (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 21)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 22)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 22)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Vadim Antonov (Mar 22)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 22)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Mike Trest (In Japan) (Mar 22)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Peter E. Giza (Mar 23)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Sean M. Doran (Mar 24)
- Re: IP over SONET considered harmful? Peter Lothberg (Mar 27)
