nanog mailing list archives
RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX
From: woods () most weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 17:06:17 -0400 (EDT)
[ On Fri, May 8, 1998 at 13:08:57 (-0400), Eric Germann wrote: ]
Subject: RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Also, if you're looking for a Radius solution to interface with a real relational db, NT works out a LOT cheaper than Sybase or Oracle on Unix.
I don't know of anyone building their own Unix based solution who would
bother to buy a commercial RDBMS when there are ample and appropriate
freeware options. That goes double for anyone using one of the *BSDs,
even that commercial one....
(I still don't see how NT could possibly be cheaper than Unix in any
case -- the NT server license alone should pay for quite a few
consulting hours [you shouldn't need a top level expert -- maybe even
just a good co-op student] if you don't already have in-house systems
programmer(s)....)
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <gwoods () acm org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Martin, Christian (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Eric Germann (May 08)
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Greg A. Woods (May 08)
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX jeyers (May 08)
