nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks?


From: Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 15:21:45 -0500

On Sat, May 16, 1998 at 04:04:46PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:

You should not have had the original problem (IMHO of course).

How do you mean?

Consider, Jon, what happens if you fail to meet the criteria to keep that
whole /19 - some time down the road.

I can see that being a serious concern for really small ISPs getting a /20
from a reserved /19 if they only currently utilize a /21 and have to fill
the /19 in 18 months.  We had 2 UUNet /20's to renumber out of.  Filling
the reserved /19 won't be a problem...I just need to file the paperwork to
get the top half of the /19 officially allocated. 

Why do you need to renumber out of previous space if MCI doesn't have to
when they get a bigger block handed to them?

Why should your *customers* bear the burden of this policy?

My point: you shouldn't, and your customer's shouldn't.  You should, as a
multi-homed ISP, be able to get a /19 immediately and without obstruction -
period.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                             | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost


Current thread: