nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks?


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 16:36:10 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 16 May 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:

Why do you need to renumber out of previous space if MCI doesn't have to
when they get a bigger block handed to them?

Well...because I knew from day 1 that our UUNet space was non-portable,
and that we were effectively borrowing it.

Why should your *customers* bear the burden of this policy?

This was the part that sucked.  Renumbering was a bitch, but with proper
planning, it really wasn't too big a deal...just lots of work.
Renumbering is one of those tasks during which you really find out which
of your customers have clues and which are a few clues short of a full
deck.

My point: you shouldn't, and your customer's shouldn't.  You should, as a
multi-homed ISP, be able to get a /19 immediately and without obstruction -
period.

We didn't start out multihomed.  We were singlehomed for 3 years.  Are you
saying we should have been able to keep our UUNet IP space (even though we
left UUNet)?

------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net>  |  http://noagent.com/?jl1 for cheap 
 Network Administrator       |  life insurance over the net.
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____



Current thread: