nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html
From: Stephen Schmidt <steve () eagle ais net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 11:51:38 -0500 (CDT)
For the first time we have had to deal with Sprint's routing policy as defined by http://www.sprint.net/filter.htm. Here is the situation. One of our dialup customers wants to access his website in the 206.116.31.0/24 network at another provider. PSI is advertising it as a /24. According to Sprint's routing policy, they do not honour anything longer than a /19 in 206.0.0.0/8 .
It's interesting that PSI routes it at all. While IP ownership (note the
NON-PORTABLE below) and routing aren't necessarily interconnected, I
suggest contacting the block's owner and seeing if they know it's
alternately routed. If they wish, they can request that PSI un-route this
block. However, that would break whomever is using it. The user should
re-number into PSI space, and this issue will go away. If the user is
multi-homed, they should investigate the adivisibility of getting a CIDR
block which they can announce as an aggregate.
My $0.02
___
iSTAR Internet Inc. (NETBLK-ISTAR0005)
250 Albert Street, Suite 202
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6M1
Canada
Netname: ISTAR0005
Netblock: 206.116.0.0 - 206.116.255.0
Maintainer: ISTR
Coordinator:
iSTAR Registration (ISTARREG-ARIN) registration () ISTAR CA
613-780-2200
Alternate Contact:
iSTAR Internet Inc. (ISTARDS-ARIN) direct-assist () istar ca
tel (613) 780-2200 fax (613) 780-6666
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
NS1.OTTAWA.ISTAR.NET 198.53.64.7
NS2.OTTAWA.ISTAR.NET 198.53.64.14
ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
Record last updated on 23-May-96.
Database last updated on 5-May-98 16:09:35 EDT.
I am now in the position trying to explain to the very non-technical
customer, why he cant reach that site, which from his point of view just
seems like I am passing the buck...
Anyways, my question is, are their any other ISPs/NSPs that follow the same
guidelines. UUNet seems to honor it just fine, as does MCI. Is Sprint
more hardnosed than most ?
---Mike
**********************************************************************
Mike Tancsa (mike () sentex net) * To do is to be -- Nietzsche
Sentex Communications Corp, * To be is to do -- Sartre
Cambridge, Ontario * Do be do be do -- Sinatra
(http://www.sentex.net/~mdtancsa) *
--
_/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ Stephen E. Schmidt
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ Vice President, Access
_/ _/ _/ _/ American Information Systems, Inc.
_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ E-mail: steve () ais net, http://www.ais.net
For my PGP public key, email me with the
subject "pgp request"
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Current thread:
- Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Mike Tancsa (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Stephen Schmidt (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Phillip Vandry (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Bryan Fullerton (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Jason L. Weisberger (May 06)
- NEW: ISP-CACHING Email Discussion for ISP's, Caching Systems Christopher Knight (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Mark Kent (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Michael Dillon (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Jared Mauch (May 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Lehrer, Neil (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Michael Gibson (May 07)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Stephen Schmidt (May 06)
