nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks?
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 10:25:15 -0400
On Sat, May 16, 1998 at 03:48:42PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
Contrast that to what MCI or any other "major" carrier announces today, and then tell me why this isn't a superior, easier to implement, and WORKABLE policy. CC: Arin Advisory Council
I don't see that there's anything wrong with it, which makes your CC exactly on point. The only potential problem I see is the usual one: you want to put the people who are most likely to expand at the bottom of the largest blocks... but how do you tell whom they _are_. :-) I have this exact problem pending myself... my new upstream is perfectly willing to give me a /24... but I said "nah, let's be cool about it: give me a /27, but put it at the bottom of a /24, and when we need more, we'll ask. If we don't ask, in a reasonable amout of time, then you can stuff someone else in there." The question is, of course, what's a "reasonable" amount of time... Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby, Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592 Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
Current thread:
- Re: Two renumbering questions Alan Hannan (May 01)
- Re: Two renumbering questions Kim Hubbard (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Two renumbering questions Steve Sobol (May 01)
- Re: Two renumbering questions Steve Sobol (May 01)
- Re: Two renumbering questions Brian Wallingford (May 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Two renumbering questions Jay R. Ashworth (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Two renumbering questions John R. Levine (May 05)
