nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Great Exchange


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:14:17 -0400

On Thu, May 28, 1998 at 03:19:26AM +0000, Michael Shields wrote:
Until I can make a one-hour call from DC to Moscow for the same price,
or even a similar price, as a one-hour call to New York, it's not
equitable that I can ftp for the same price.

Which resource is it that you are pre-empting, Michael, when you FTP
that file?

Circuit switching (TASI notwithstanding) and packet switching have
different scarcity, and therefore pricing, models.

Could be.  I think the economic basis is there; I just don't know if
it's strong enough to overcome customers' love of flat-rate.

I think that it is not, and I don't think it's worth it to a whole
bunch of people to buy three times as much router CPU to do the work.

Probably it will never make market sense to have distance-sensitive
traffic pricing for "low-speed" users, where the cost of providing the
service is mostly the cost of tech support, billing, dialin or xDSL
aggregation, &c., and bandwidth is a small proportion of the cost.

With current trends, will the actual bandwidth _ever_ be more than a
small fraction of the cost?  Except _maybe_ on trans-oceanic lines...
and bet on that situation to get better, not worse, as well.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Two words: Darth Doogie."  -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida             on alt.fan.heinlein             +1 813 790 7592

Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com


Current thread: