nanog mailing list archives
Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:52:11 +0300 (MSK)
Our present BGP policy states that if a customer has non-portable address space from another upstream ISP, the customer must provide us with an official letter from the owner of the IP address space which authorizes us to re-announce those routes. I feel that this is a reasonable and just policy, but we've been getting quite a bit of flack from customers who claim that nobody else is requiring this.
I am not sure about USA, but it's usial practic here in Russia - we ask e-mail permission from the network owner, and hardly recommend to change address (and warn about _we are doing it at your own risk). The problems are boths political and technical - Internet is not build todays for such _by-specific_ customers and often, if we anounce the specific of the other provider XX, we use partically the bandwidth of XX (esp. if we have peering aggreement with XX). Alex. ----
Are other backbone providers really just announcing whatever their
customers ask them to announce? Are we unreasonable in requiring
permission to re-announce foreign netblocks? Is there any documentation
that sets this down as policy or at least a BCP?
Also, is it unreasonable to expect someone who wants to speak BGP to know
how to make entries in the RADB, or at least read and follow the
instructions? I'm getting the feeling that the latest tech briefings for
executives are touting the wonders of BGP, 'cause I'm seeing a lot of
pointy-haired bosses demanding it.
ObNetops: router bgp xxxx
neighbor 192.168.100.2 remote-as 64666
neighbor 192.168.100.2 route-map cust-do-not-readvertise in
neighbor 192.168.100.2 route-map out-customer out
Jeremiah Kristal
Qwest Internet Solutions
Manager, Network Services
201-319-5764
x284 internal
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
Current thread:
- route announcement question (political rather than technical) Jeremiah Kristal (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Jeremiah Kristal (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Jeremiah Kristal (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) prue (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Jeff Weisberg (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Vadim Antonov (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Jeff Weisberg (Mar 24)
- Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical) Charles Sprickman (Mar 24)
