nanog mailing list archives
Re: lame delegations
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry () Mlink NET>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:56:25 -0400 (EDT)
Why not this? Registrars only accept to create a glue record if there already exists a PTR entry for the requested address that points to the right name. -Phil
I suspect that solving this correctly would depend on the ICANN DNSO recognising the authentication mechanisms of the databases of the RIR's under the ICANN ASO (RIPE, ARIN, APNIC). Unfortunately, no-one thought of this problem when they let registrars inject host records. The only way to verify automatically that a host record is allowed from a given netblock is to use the same authentication mechanisms that (say) RIPE do for reverse delegations.
Current thread:
- lame delegations John O Comeau (Aug 17)
- Re: lame delegations John R. Levine (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Derek J. Balling (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Patrick Evans (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Derek J. Balling (Aug 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: lame delegations John O Comeau (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Joshua Goodall (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Phillip Vandry (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Derek J. Balling (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Joshua Goodall (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Gary E. Miller (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Derek J. Balling (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Joshua Goodall (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Alex Kamantauskas (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations Greg A. Woods (Aug 19)
- Re: lame delegations Joshua Goodall (Aug 18)
- Re: lame delegations John R. Levine (Aug 18)
- RE: lame delegations Joshua Goodall (Aug 18)
