nanog mailing list archives
Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 01:36:21 -0800 (PST)
> Those of us who are willing to communicate with each other
> should go ahead and write up a BCP, because the folks who're
> scared to admit that they're fallible won't follow it anyway.
I agree entirely. I can't stand it when people are too sheepish to
publish Best Common Practices just because there are a few companies that
don't feel like putting in the effort to do a halfway decent job. God
knows we wouldn't want anyone to feel left out, even if they do insist on
running open relays, or redistributing their IGP or whatever. Bleah.
-Bill
Current thread:
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Bill Woodcock (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Sean Donelan (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) dave o'leary (Feb 03)
