nanog mailing list archives

Re: Operational impact of filtering SMB/NETBIOS traffic?


From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:48:35 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Gary E. Miller wrote:

I have had my upstream filter these ports on me before.  They
get an angry call right away.  I use SMB to mount remote shares,
do remote authentication and remote printing.  Sure most people
do not know how to do this, but I have taught a lot of my
customers to do it.  Road Warriors love it.  They never want to
go back to the old ways.

I have worked at several ISPs that found the easiest way
to reduce the customer list was to start filtering.  A lot of
folks do not complain, they just move on to another ISP.

I think SMB attacks are a serious problem and did not have problems
at the one place I worked where the ISP started arbitrarily filtering SMB
- the only problem was that they gave no warning before doing it.
 
A good compromise is to notify your customers that you are
providing the extra "service" and let them opt-out if they
choose.

Agreed.
 

-- 
Steve Sobol, BOFH, President    888.480.4NET 866.DSL.EXPRESS 216.619.2NET
North Shore Technologies Corporation   http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net
JustTheNet/JustTheNet EXPRESS DSL (ISP Services) http://JustThe.net
mailto:sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net   Proud resident of Cleveland, OH




Current thread: