nanog mailing list archives
Re: Code Red growth stats
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:36:22 -0400
In message <200108012026.QAA29111 () thelonius ai mit edu>, Petr Swedock writes:
There's no indication on how the stats are collected... Is it by IP addr reported? Does it take into account duplicates (re-infection rates?)
While they don't say, the "number of infected hosts" graph makes me
assume that they're counting unique IP addresses that tried to hit them.
As I said, my numbers are consistent with others posted here. And I've
gotten private mail about another, similar observation -- Code Red,
Round 2, appears to have peaked a few hours ago.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Dave Stewart (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Code Red growth stats Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Code Red growth stats Dave Stewart (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats michael (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Scott Stursa (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Joe Shaw (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Jasper Wallace (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Larry Rosenman (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Dave Stewart (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Daniel Senie (Aug 02)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Greg A. Woods (Aug 01)
