nanog mailing list archives
Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:20:54 -0700
On 08/21/01, David Ulevitch <davidu () everydns net> wrote:
I believe they are just a licensee of RealNames. So while http://somedumbcompany.lame might work in Internet Explorer 5.0+ Try telnetting to somedumbcompany.lame:25. They won't get email, EVER. This company is even more bogus then new.net. At least new.net is /trying/ to use dns.
We should expect to see more of these crop up. Through closed
doors and other unfriendly policies, ICANN has screwed us but
good -- and we let them.
ObOperationalContent: what methods do y'all use for disseminating
info like "watch out for this new stupidity" to your front-line
tech support folks? How about for companies that outsource their
support? Is it even worth trying?
--
J.D. Falk a plenitude should not be wasted
<jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Current thread:
- Re: Routescience?, (continued)
- Re: Routescience? Vadim Antonov (Aug 22)
- RE: Routescience? David Schwartz (Aug 22)
- Re: Routescience? Mike Lloyd (Aug 22)
- Re: Routescience? Vadim Antonov (Aug 23)
- Re: Routescience? Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 23)
- Re: Routescience? Sean Finn (Aug 23)
- Re: Routescience? Peter Francis (Aug 23)
- XTNS launch alternate domain name system Tim Langdell (Aug 21)
- RE: XTNS launch alternate domain name system David Ulevitch (Aug 21)
- Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system J.D. Falk (Aug 21)
- RE: XTNS launch alternate domain name system Alex Bligh (Aug 21)
- Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system Jason A. Mills (Aug 21)
- Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system John Fraizer (Aug 21)
- Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system Scott Francis (Aug 21)
- Re: XTNS launch alternate domain name system Scott Francis (Aug 21)
- RE: Routescience? Vadim Antonov (Aug 22)
- RE: Routescience? E.B. Dreger (Aug 22)
