nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 05:54:46 +0000 (UCT)
I mean peering speed between a single pair of ISPs at a single exchange (or peering) point exceeds that of a single interface. And, if you need many, say 10, interfaces, l1 have all the flexibilities Vadim want.Layer 1 peering (or pooling, as it's more usually known) is great for interconnecting fiber networks, fast provisioning, and all that.You may say that we are not ready for full fiber networking, yet.
Any given interface is inherently rate limited.
When demand exceeds the capacity, something must be
done. Often this is done w/ "striping" or "muxing"
where multiple "low-speed" channels are "bonded" into
a single virtual path. L1 is not that different than
L2 & L3 in these cases. The specific dynamics are
unique per layer but the problem remains the same.
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: Exchange point networks, (continued)
- Re: Exchange point networks Neil J. McRae (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks hardie (Feb 24)
- RE: Exchange point networks Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- Re: Exchange point networks bmanning (Feb 24)
- RE: Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- Re: Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: Dave Curado (Feb 24)
- Re: Masataka Ohta (Feb 24)
- Re: Vadim Antonov (Feb 24)
- Re: Daniel L. Golding (Feb 24)
- Re: Vadim Antonov (Feb 24)
- Re: Craig A. Haney (Feb 24)
