nanog mailing list archives
Re: Code Red
From: lucifer () lightbearer com
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Dave Stewart wrote:
At 11:12 PM 7/19/2001, lucifer () lightbearer com wrote:Reports from our monitoring systems saw the CPU usage jump by somewhere between 150-200% for our core routers today; our current theory is thatWeb servers that were hit beginning this morning at 11:26:41 EDT have not seen another attempt since 19:49:53. I'm wondering if this because it was coming up on 00:00:00 GMT 20-July-2001. According to the PC-Cillin write up, the 100-thread scan only takes place if the system date is less than 20, but if it's 20-28, it launches it's DOS attack at www1.whitehouse.gov Does anybody really know yet what payloads this thing is carrying?
That would roughly correspond with the dropoff in CPU usage, here. Not proof, but... reasonably strong circumstantial. I guess we'll see for sure tomorrow, depending on how the traffic stats look. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com lucifer () lightbearer com http://www.lightbearer.com/~lucifer
Current thread:
- Re: Code Red Jeff Ogden (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Patrick Greenwell (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Seth M. Kusiak (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Rob Thomas (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Seth M. Kusiak (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red lucifer (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Bill Woodcock (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Dave Stewart (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red lucifer (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 19)
- Re: Code Red John Kristoff (Jul 20)
- Re: Code Red Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 20)
- Re: Code Red Larry Sheldon (Jul 20)
- Re: Code Red Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 20)
- Re: Code Red Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 20)
- Re: Code Red Patrick Greenwell (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Code Red Joe Blanchard (Jul 19)
