nanog mailing list archives
Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp
From: Mitch Halmu <mitch () netside net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Jason A. Mills wrote:
I'm not sure I see why a POTS PPP link, or some other slow(er) on demand link might stop CodeRed. The first-pass payload is under 4096 bytes including framing, not exactly something you need a lot of low-latency bandwidth to push through. :-/ -J
The problem I described is that the Windows machines in question are not necessarily dedicated web servers, but can be regular dial-in users. Normally, such users don't run a web server over dial-up, yet they seem to be vulnerable if the attack occurs while they're connected. No relation to the connection bandwidth was implied. --Mitch NetSide
Current thread:
- Code Red on dial-in ppp Mitch Halmu (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Jason A. Mills (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Mitch Halmu (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp up (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Damon M. Conway (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Chris Adams (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp John Kristoff (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Keith Woodworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Mitch Halmu (Jul 21)
- Code Red seemingly on firewall (Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp) E.B. Dreger (Jul 21)
- Re: Code Red on dial-in ppp Jason A. Mills (Jul 21)
