nanog mailing list archives
RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..')
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Yo Chance! On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Chance Whaley wrote:
I don't remember IBM or EDS being sued on the times when ATC has failed. Jeppeson hasn't been sued for issuing incorrect maps either. Software programmers arent sued when monitoring machines in hospitals fail. Oh that's right, because there are neat things called "Limits of Liability", "Gross Negligence", and "Malicious Intent".
Do some research. Just because you have not heard about it does not
mean it did not happen. Jeppeson lost a BIG one after the AA crash in Cali.
Jeppesson still has suits pending about Ron Brown's (US Commerce
Secretary) going down in Kosovo. Technicare (a former client of mine)
lost a BIG one after the runaway software on a CAT scanner fried a patient
to death. Never heard of anyone dieing due to an ATC outage so that
issue is still open.
In any case, the comment I was replying to was about software not
being able to hurt anybody. The US legal system found in two of the
cases above that it can and has.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem () rellim com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
Current thread:
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..'), (continued)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dave Stewart (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Matt Levine (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Adam McKenna (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Joseph T. Klein (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Chance Whaley (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Chance Whaley (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dave Stewart (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Owen DeLong (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Henry Yen (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Michael Airhart (Jul 25)
