nanog mailing list archives

Re: C&W Peering Problem?

From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)


    > Seems that C&W no longer has full routes.

Well, don't let your rhetoric get too far out ahead of the facts:

   AS      PfxRcd
   1        94319
   1239     95748
   701      98084
   3561    101262  <-- Cable & Wireless
   6461    102686
   715      96438

                                -Bill

Current thread:

C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
  - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Simon Lockhart (Jun 01)
    - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Jason Lewis (Jun 01)
    - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 01)
    - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Scott Patterson (Jun 01)
    - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christian Nielsen (Jun 05)
  - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
    - Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Karyn Ulriksen (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
  - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Steve Schaefer (Jun 01)
  - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Jeff Mcadams (Jun 02)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
  - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Vivien M. (Jun 01)
    - Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 02)
    - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Albert Meyer (Jun 02)
  - RE: C&W Peering Problem? Mike Leber (Jun 01)

(Thread continues...)