nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
From: Sam Thomas <sthomas () lart net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:16:50 +0000
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:40:41AM -0400, Steve Goldstein wrote:
At 10:54 AM -0400 6/6/01, Craig A. Haney wrote:didn't we all already know this?I thought that we "knew" that, according to self-similarity, burstiness would be seen at all levels of aggregation. I wonder if scaling rules apply as the aggregation increases (backbones). That is, at high levels of aggregation, would we have to look at smaller time intervals to see the burstiness? Don't know if the Ball Labs folk did that.
also interesting would be experimentation in determining what level of route oscillation breaks this axiom. is the stability of macroscopic flows retained for all but macroscopic route oscillation? does it remain even for macroscopic route oscillation? thinking further...is it reasonable to believe that macroscopically internet routing is static? -- Sam Thomas Geek Mercenary
Current thread:
- Internet Traffic Discovery? Craig A. Haney (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? E.B. Dreger (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Vijay Gill (Jun 06)
- RE: Internet Traffic Discovery? Deepak Jain (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Steve Goldstein (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Dorian Kim (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Steve Goldstein (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? k claffy (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Steve Goldstein (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Dorian Kim (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Sam Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Jerry Scharf (Jun 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet Traffic Discovery? Walter Prue (Jun 06)
