nanog mailing list archives
Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:34:40 -0400
Easy... ip route 127.254.254.254 255.255.255.255 null0 BGP sees this as a valid route, straight to the bit bucket. -C
Even if they don't, who's to say what's unreachable? If the NEXT_HOP is truly unreachable, in that there is no route to it, the BGP path won't be marked as valid and won't make it to the IP routing table (Loc-RIB.) I've long felt that IP should have come with a provision for an address that is never routed. It would be great if we could get something like 127.0.0.2 for this very task. Mark
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Dan Foster (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Jim Shankland (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Walter Prue (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding lucifer (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Mark Mentovai (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Mark Mentovai (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding lucifer (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Hank Nussbacher (Jun 03)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 04)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Mark Mentovai (Jun 04)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 04)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Dan Hollis (Jun 04)
