nanog mailing list archives
Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria)
From: smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
| I would imagine that such actions tend to irritate the hive of regulatory
| officials. Self regulation would be one way to prevent such action.
The answer is simple: have more lawyers than most jurisdictions
have civil servants.
q: what is a phone company?
a: it's a law firm with a side-interest in telecommunications
q: what do phone company facilities look like?
a: boxes with no windows stuffed with lawyers and an antenna on top
q: who has more employees? a standalone ISP or a phone company's legal
branch's Human Resources department?
a: that's not funny. see you in court.
q: is it true that some phone companies' legal branches are revenue centres?
a: oh yes. and don't forget that at least one IXC _literally_
sued itself into existence.
Is there any serious and relevant regulatory authority which
is going to intervene in a contractual dispute between parties
which are NOT dominant in their industry?
It seems to me that players like C&W face vigorous competition.
Sean.
PS - can you tell how much i hate it when vaguely technical people
pose ex cathedra about vaguely legal & regulatory issues?
- --
Sean Doran <smd () clock org>
Current thread:
- Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria) Sean M. Doran (Jun 06)
- Re: Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria) James Thomason (Jun 06)
- Re: Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria) Ron da Silva (Jun 07)
