nanog mailing list archives
Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
From: Andrew Barros <abarros () tjhsst edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:34:44 -0400
I'm not a cogent customer right now, but they were going to donate
some connectivity to a group i volunteer with (www.kidzonline.org),
I think I have some technical materials at the office.
-ajb
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:36:39PM -0700, Matt Levine wrote:
->
->
->-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
->Hash: SHA1
->
->Well, the network really wasn't lit at the time of the last
->discussion.
->Is anyone on-list a cogent customer? Has anyone done or heard about
->any peering with cogent? If so what type of pipe?
->
->Could they do a lot of damage if some customers start to really push
->traffic? (ie: 30 "big" customers pushing 500 megs each and throwing
->an extra 15gigs/sec onto mae-east).
->
->
->Matt
->
->
->- -----Original Message-----
->From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf
->Of Steve Rude
->Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:13 PM
->To: Murphy, Brennan
->Cc: 'nanog () merit edu'
->Subject: Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
->
->
->
->I believe that this is a topic that has been brought up before.
->
->http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2000-12/threads2.html#00175
->
->
->- ----
->Steve Rude
->steve () rudedogg com
->
->On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Murphy, Brennan wrote:
->
->>
->> I was wondering if anyone had any experience with Cogent Inc. They
->> are one of the companies offering high speed internet (fast
->> ethernet/GigE) at rock bottom prices. :-)
->>
->> I know the adage "you get what you pay for" typically applies but I
->> was looking for some concrete end user experiences. I'm not
->> trying to break the charter of this mailing list by devoting a
->> discussion to various emotion based opinions about a particular
->> vendor. I am
->> actually seeking technical opinions on whether what is being
->> advertised is actually being delivered with reliability. More
->> specific questions: do Cogent's peering arrangements seem adequate
->> to the
->> amount of bandwidth they are offering? Or are these major
->> bottlenecks to an otherwise good network? Are any of Cogent's
->> competitors worth taking a look at? Any non-obvious reason why?
->> Does anyone have any statistics to provide that paints a picture
->> about what you get from their products? I guess if enough people
->> complained that this was too off topic, I could still request
->> direct replies and I could put a summary together for any
->> interested parties. But I reread the charter before putting this
->> together and it seems fair game. When is
->> Worldcom, et al going to start offering these products? ( maybe
->> when companies like cogent start succeeding?) Thanks,
->> -BM
->>
->>
->
->
->-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
->Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
->
->iQA/AwUBOya1lcp0j1NsDQTPEQJ0iQCgwVlzn5NbcsSZJKnzqZaAyXVoyOAAoIP+
->r4g+xh7w5/gCKPfHETVzA3W3
->=SAmy
->-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---end quoted text---
--
Andrew Barros <abarros () tjhsst edu>
PGP Key Fingerprint:
D3B8 0800 C45A 143E 5CF0 E112 0A1B AB36 B655 1FB8
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- cogentco.com technical analysis? Murphy, Brennan (Jun 12)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Steve Rude (Jun 12)
- RE: cogentco.com technical analysis? Matt Levine (Jun 12)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Josh Richards (Jun 12)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Andrew Barros (Jun 12)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Omachonu Ogali (Jun 13)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 14)
- What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Erik Antelman (Jun 14)
- Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 14)
- Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 14)
- Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Josh Richards (Jun 14)
- RE: cogentco.com technical analysis? Matt Levine (Jun 12)
- Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Josh Richards (Jun 14)
- RE: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Vivien M. (Jun 14)
- Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16 Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 15)
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Steve Rude (Jun 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: cogentco.com technical analysis? Albert Meyer (Jun 12)
