nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
From: Dee McKinney <deem () wdm com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:20:27 -0800 (AKDT)
Derek Balling <dredd () megacity org> wrote:
you've obviously never dealt with the California PUC. A more useless group more firmly in the pockets of the utilities themselves I have never seen.
I've never dealt with the California PUC yet....but in Alaska, it's called the RCA, for Regulatory Commision of Alaska, and has challenged the term "clueless". I'm wondering if there are any PUC commision members with any real understanding ? /Dee
Current thread:
- SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Jeff Mcadams (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Steven J. Sobol (Jun 26)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Charles Sprickman (Jun 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
