nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering]
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:11:50 -0400
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:54:14 -0700 Ted Lemon wrote:
You're missing a piece, actually - sorry about that. You need to read RFC3046 as well. I thought DOCSIS referred to it, but maybe not.
Hey! That is a *very* cool spec. Do you know if any cable equipment implements it yet (Motorola I assume?) From my packet sniffing, I don't think the DOCSIS 1.0 and 1.1 gear we use implements RFC3046 yet.
Current thread:
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering], (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Wojtek Zlobicki (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Charles Sprickman (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jun 27)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 29)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 29)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 28)
