nanog mailing list archives
Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 05:12:28 +0200 (IST)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <Pine.GSO.4.31.0103121911520.9269-100000 () meron openu ac il>, Rafi Sa dowsky writes:Hi Is there anything actually new in this exploit compared to the known TCP hijacking vulnerabilities as portrayed say in Phrack 50(Juggernaut) ?Juggernaut requires eavesdropping; this one doesn't.
No eavesdropping at all ? how can a TCP connection be hijacked if you're not on the connection path? (Or capable of diverting the connection past you - breaking routers/source_routing/<whatever>.... )
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Thanks
Rafi
Current thread:
- tcp,guardent,bellovin Chris Beggy (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin bert hubert (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Scott Francis (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Jim Duncan (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Richard A. Steenbergen (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin bert hubert (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 12)
