nanog mailing list archives
Re: QOS or more bandwidth
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:13:50 +0100 (BST)
Altho you need to have different policies for your core and for your customers.. it may be practical to increase bandwidth on the core and avoid QoS (which imho should never be employed on the core).. but its not always within a customers budget to upgrade from low speed circuits. I think as the prices drop, smaller businesses are coming online but still trying to use high bandwidth applications. As they are unable to pay for the extra bandwidth (no matter how cheap it might seem) there would appear to be a good case for using QoS on your PE/CPE links. Steve On Tue, 29 May 2001, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
On 28 May 2001 23:17:46 -0700 Sean Donelan wrote:While its generally more effective to add more bandwidth than rationing it with QOS, with the recent downturn in capital markets will QOS become more popular?You are asking for projections in a scenerio where bandwidth demand drops, and bandwidth supply remains constant or grows. Projection: Bandwidth prices are dropping. QOS still sucks. regards, fletcher
Current thread:
- QOS or more bandwidth Sean Donelan (May 28)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Fletcher E Kittredge (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth E.B. Dreger (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Fletcher E Kittredge (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Frank Coluccio (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Ukyo Kuonji (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Irwin Lazar (May 29)
