nanog mailing list archives
More BW, Less Taxes
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:37:27 +0000 (UCT)
FWIW, I recently heard someone ask the question - "how do you go to your investors and tell them you need more money for more bandwidth because you don't want to efficiently manage your existing capacity?" This is the business case for QoS, IMHO. IrwinWhich costs more, wholesale, raw bitpipes or qualified engineering talent to create/police the policies needed to maintain QoS? --bill That's the $64k question. :-)From what I've seen, there isn't a simple answer. In places where bandwidthis exorbantantly expensive (such as outside the United States), simply over provisioning isn't an acceptable answer.
Why does BW cost so much?
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth bmanning (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Alex Rubenstein (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Albert Meyer (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes RJ Atkinson (May 29)
