nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart () mfnx net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 20:50:28 -0700
Disclaimer: I am not speaking for my employer. This disclaimer is, however, included solely for the amusement of Stephen Stuart; any other use may be a violation of his rights to amusement. (http://www.irbs.com/internet/nanog/0104/0164.html)
I am suitably amused. Stephen
Current thread:
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?, (continued)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Paul Vixie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Joseph T. Klein (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Simon Lyall (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? hardie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 08)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Stephen Stuart (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Mike Leber (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Paul Vixie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Alex Bligh (May 08)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Charles Scott (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? John Payne (May 06)
