nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stealth Blocking
From: "Mike Batchelor" <mikebat () tmcs net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:04:01 -0700
Did I say POP-before-SMTP? I don't think I did... SMTP AUTH and TLS are two completely setups than POP-before-SMTP and both are supported by any decent MUA. I agree POP-before-SMTP was not a good plan but it worked before the SMTP AUTH mechanism came of age. Now there is no logical reason not to use it. Or let me guess you don't authenicate your NNTP server either like most reputable USENET server admins are doing.
Sorry, I just have to respond to this. If the solution to the open relay problem is to make all users/customers upgrade their mail software so that SMTP AUTH can be used instead, then why not extend this idea to its logical conclusion and stop using IPv4? Just do it, it's only a software upgrade, after all, same as upgrading to MUAs that support SMTP AUTH. IPv6 would probably help make a bigger dent in the spam problem than MAPS ever will. It's just a software upgrade, no sweat right? Yet I know someone is going to say "but that's different". I don't think it is, at least not different in kind. Lessee... RFC 2487 is SMTP over TLS, dated January 1999, and RFC 2554 is SMTP AUTH, dated March 1999. So that's a wholesale upgrade of mail infrastructure that has been more or less completed (forced?) in just two years. IPv6 is described in RFC 1883, dated December 1995. And here it is, 6 years later... I think a lot of priorities are bass-ackwards. Or maybe I'm just naive, and there's other considerations, other agendas at work that I'm not aware of.
Jeremy T. Bouse -- ,----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------, |Jeremy T. Bouse, CCNA - UnderGrid Network Services, LLC -
www.UnderGrid.net | | Public PGP/GPG fingerprint and location in headers of message | | If received unsigned (without requesting as such) DO NOT trust it! | | jbouse () Debian org - NIC Whois: JB5713 - Jeremy.Bouse () UnderGrid net | `--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --'
Current thread:
- Stealth Blocking Dee McKinney (May 21)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Albert Meyer (May 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 22)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jeremy T. Bouse (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jeremy T. Bouse (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Mike Batchelor (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Derek Balling (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jeremy T. Bouse (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Paul Vixie (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking John Payne (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Scott Raymond (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Andy (May 23)
