nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall () ehsco com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:02:34 -0700
The negative side effect is that it cripples people who use email as a file transfer protocol.Which I do, quite extensively. Transit providers shouldn't be doing this.
I agree. Access providers should be, however. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Current thread:
- Re: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dan Hollis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jason Slagle (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Daniel Senie (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jeremy T. Bouse (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dan Hollis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Scott Francis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) Adam Rothschild (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking J.D. Falk (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
