nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:09:21 -0400
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:46:19AM -0700, Eric A. Hall wrote:
TCP rate-limiting on outbound traffic to *:25 would also be extremely effective, particularly on unclassified customer traffic, and without the heavy-handed nature of denying all dial-up traffic. Rate-limiting doesn't interfere with low-volume legitimate mail, but it really cramps spam.
It interferes heavily with transmission of large files via email, though, and this *IS* a valid use of service.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Christopher B. Zydel (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Richard A. Steenbergen (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Steve Sobol (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Mike Batchelor (May 25)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jason Slagle (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 24)