nanog mailing list archives
RE: EMAIL != FTP
From: "Robert Blayzor" <rblayzor () thebiz net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:11:31 -0400
It's not the attachments that's the problem. It's companies that sell software that looks at attachments with a fundementally screwed-up security model.
Correct, but having that nice little convenience in almost every mail agent out there now "because everyone uses attachments" makes it really easy to exploit this. -- Robert Blayzor IP Network Engineer, BOFH BiznessOnline.com, Inc. rblayzor () thebiz net noc () thebiz net http://www.thebiz.net/ FreeBSD, Putting the 'Operating' back into OS! -- http://www.freebsd.org/
Current thread:
- EMAIL != FTP, (continued)
- EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- EMAIl ==> MAIL ==> parsels + letters Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP M. David Leonard (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Wayne Bouchard (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP David Charlap (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Greg Maxwell (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Shawn McMahon (May 25)
