nanog mailing list archives
Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:56:40 +0200 (IST)
Says who ? - maybe you didn't check the right one ?
whois -h whois.radb.net 132.0.0.0
route: 132.0.0.0/10
descr: DISA, DSAC
P. O. Box 1605
Columbus
OH 43216-5002, USA
origin: AS568
member-of: RS-COMM_US_FED
mnt-by: MAINT-AS568
changed: nsfnet-admin () merit edu 19940819
source: RADB
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:
132.0.0.0/10 is floating around:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>show ip bgp 132.0.0.0/10
BGP routing table entry for 132.0.0.0/10, version 12484641
Paths: (43 available, best #41)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
64.166.72.140
4513 13646 5696 568, (aggregated by 568 198.26.128.1)
195.66.224.82 from 195.66.224.82 (209.10.12.222)
Origin IGP, metric 7602, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate
[snip, route-views has more than a page of entries for it]
However, it doesn't apprar to be registered:
% whois -h whois.arin.net 132.0.0.0
No match for "132.0.0.0".
568 regisitered to disa.mil, and a number of longer prefixes
inside the /10 are registered to .mil addresses:
% whois -h whois.arin.net 132.15.0.0
Kadena Air Base (NET-KADENA-NET)
Bldg 792, Kadena AB JA
APO, AP 96368-5149
US
The question is, do they legitimately own the whole /10? If
so, why isn't it marked in the databases?
Current thread:
- 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Matt Levine (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Borchers, Mark (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 28)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)
