nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 18:32:08 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Peter Galbavy wrote:
"I am a big ISP, you are a smaller connectivity/access provider. You pay me for requesting traffic through my network."
"I am a big ISP, you are a smaller ISP who does mainly hosting. You pay me for sending traffic through my network."
This is all simple economics. As long as there is sufficient competition, everybody pretty much pays reasonable prices. If the small networks operate only in one region and the large network continent- or world wide, it is entirely reasonable that the large network won't peer: they would carry the majority of the traffic transport costs. On the other hand, if the small network is also continent-wide but just not as big, it would be unreasonable and anti-competitive.
I can't wait until the DoJ or the EUCC leaves off M$ enough to investigate the 'free market' of peering and excahnge points. Can't be too long.
:-)
Current thread:
- RE: Verio Peering Question Daniel Golding (Oct 01)
- RE: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question John A. Tamplin (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Peter Galbavy (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Marshall Eubanks (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
