nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois syntax
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 13:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
There is no standard specified in the RFC for output, just for query language.
Is RFC954 a standard in any real sense? Seems to me that the RFC2026 designation for that document would be "Historic", although RFC954 is old enough that it is not labelled with a maturity level.
Well, the process is standardizes is so simple and flexible there
obviously hasn't been any need to change the past 16 years:
PROTOCOL
To access the NICNAME/WHOIS server:
Connect to the SRI-NIC service host at TCP service port 43
(decimal).
Send a single "command line", ending with <CRLF> (ASCII CR and
LF).
Receive information in response to the command line. The server
closes its connection as soon as the output is finished.
The only consistent similarities I can find between all the deployed production *IR/IRR/registry/registrar whois servers is (a) that they all let you look stuff up, and (b) they all listen on 43/tcp.
Isn't trying to standardize the output of whois servers is like trying to standardize the output of HTTP servers? Since this output is for human consumtion (well, after HTML parsing in the case of HTTP) standardizing has very few benefits.
Current thread:
- whois syntax Andrew Brown (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Matt Martini (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax bmanning (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Robert Boyle (Oct 18)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 19)
- Re: whois syntax Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Vadim Antonov (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Greg A. Woods (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax bmanning (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 20)
- Re: whois syntax Vadim Antonov (Oct 21)
- Re: whois syntax Joe Abley (Oct 19)
- Re: whois syntax Matt Martini (Oct 18)
