nanog mailing list archives
Re: Worm Probes
From: Mark Kent <mark () mainstreet net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
I had 482 infected hosts scanning my server. Anyone want to see a list so they can look for their hosts send me an email and I will be happy to forward you my infected file
Based on a sample of two, I'm guessing that there might be a small intersection between lists from different sites... at least at this early stage. I took a list I generated from traffic coming into a web server on my net and applied an ACL which then lit up as expected with many "hits". Then, I applied the same list to a circuit at a site I manage, off my net, and got very few hits. This site has a 10Mb/s jump in traffic today, so they are seeing this new virus, but it's not by the same set of 600+ IP addresses that I've seen. -mark
Current thread:
- RE: Worm probes, (continued)
- RE: Worm probes Los, Ralph (Sep 18)
- FW: Worm probes Braun, Mike (Sep 18)
- Re: FW: Worm probes Rob Evans (Sep 18)
- Re: FW: Worm probes Jim Olsen (Sep 18)
- RE: Worm probes Roeland Meyer (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm probes Jim Mercer (Sep 18)
- FW: Re: Worm probes Roeland Meyer (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm Probes Roeland Meyer (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm Probes Bill Becker (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm Probes Bill Larson (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm Probes Mark Kent (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm Probes Bill Becker (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm probes Ulf Zimmermann (Sep 18)
- Re: Re: FW: Worm probes Frank Coluccio (Sep 18)
- RE: Worm probes Roeland Meyer (Sep 18)
- RE: Worm probes Smith, Rick (Sep 18)
- Re: Worm probes Ulf Zimmermann (Sep 18)
