nanog mailing list archives
Re: Afghanistan [OT]
From: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps () post1 com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:51:43 +0800
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:48:53PM -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
I'd say the better way of communicating would be the classical native-language radio translation in Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe fashion, otherwise known as propaganda. Worked well for the USSR.
You mean _against_ the USSR?
Radios are cheap and realtively available (and hard to control, too). May be worthwhile to actually air-drop loads of small and easy to hide solar-powered units. I'd expect a lot of people to listen to those in hiding even when threatened with execution for mere posession. Given the air superiority of NATO, controlling use of those radios by the local propaganda units can be very easy - just drop radio-guided missiles on Taliban transmitters.
How do I configure my router to filter out warmongers? -- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps () post1 com> * http://www.post1.com/home/ngps
Current thread:
- Afghanistan Smith, Rick (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Richard Welty (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Basil Kruglov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Vadim Antonov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Curtis Maurand (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Ng Pheng Siong (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] David VanHorn (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Nathan J . Mehl (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Tim Devries (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Afghanistan Hallgren, Michael (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Marshall Eubanks (Sep 18)
- RE: Afghanistan Smith, Rick (Sep 18)
- RE: Afghanistan ginny listman (Sep 19)
- RE: Afghanistan Hallgren, Michael (Sep 18)
