nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 16:05:27 -0700
<http://psg.com/~randy/010521.nanog>any plans to follow up with long term data? of particular interest would be rate of growth: routing table as a whole vs prefixes allowed by the filters vs prefixes blocked by the filters.
<http://psg.com/~randy/010809.ptomaine.pdf> randy
Current thread:
- Re: Verio Peering Question, (continued)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Dorian Kim (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question up (Sep 27)
- Re: Verio Peering Question German Martinez (Sep 27)
- RE: Verio Peering Question Eric Germann (Sep 27)
- RE: Verio Peering Question Sean M. Doran (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Schultz (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Sam Thomas (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Schultz (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 30)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jared Mauch (Sep 30)
