nanog mailing list archives
Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong sj ca us>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:20:44 -0700
This would be a mistake. There are a number of possible mechanical scenarios in which the pilot needs physical access to the cabin in order to inspect various systems of the airplane to make a determination about the proper procedures. Mechanical problems are still significantly more likely than this form of terrorist attack. Owen Bill Larson wrote:
Actually there should be an external entrance for the cockpit crew. The cockpit crew should be escorted to the cockpit by armed security officers. The door between the cockpit and the passenger cabin should be totally removed. This would prevent the luring of the flight crew to the passenger cabin and prevent passenger access to the cockpit all together. By doing this, you would have no more suicide bombings by hijackers. This does not prevent a crazy flight crewmember wanting to suicide killing the other crewmembers. However, nothing will protect against that. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hall" <j.hall () f5 com>Bullet proof bulkhead separating the pilot's compartment from the cabin that is locked/unlocked externally by the ground crew. Everyone knows the pilot *can't* open the door even if he wanted to... JMH Vadim Antonov wrote:Locked bulletproof door to the cockpit. Survelliance cameras in the passenger compartments. That all which was needed to foil the attack.NowI think it's time to ask why this isn't the standard procedure? --vadim
--
***********************************************************************
"Every time you turn on your new car, you're turning on 20
microprocessors. Every time you use an ATM, you're using a computer.
Every time I use a settop box or game machine, I'm using a computer.
The only computer you don't know how to work is your Microsoft
computer, right?"
- Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
from an April 1997 interview in Upside Magazine
***********************************************************************
Microsoft CEO Bill Gates is optimistic about Contraceptive99's
potential.
He recently said, "Our contraceptive products will help users do to
each other what we've been doing to our customers for years."
The mail above is sent from my personal account and represents my own
views. It may or may not reflect the opinions of Exodus Communications,
Jin Ho, Mo Sabourian, Tony Massing, Morris Taradalsky, or any other
employee, officer, subsidiary, acquisition, member, partner, aff
Current thread:
- Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Lloyd Taylor (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof David Howe (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Owen DeLong (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Vadim Antonov (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Dan Hollis (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Scott A Crosby (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 11)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Hall (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Bill Larson (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Owen DeLong (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Bill Larson (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof David Howe (Sep 11)
- RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Mathias Körber (Sep 12)
- RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Joel Jaeggli (Sep 12)
- Sorry... RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof Joel Jaeggli (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof M. David Leonard (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof David Howe (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof alex (Sep 12)
- Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof John Fraizer (Sep 12)
