nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:45:06 +0300
Kurtis Lindqvist wrote:
What might happen is that ISPs start using IPv6 for their (as example) DSL services to work around addressing problems. But that is not a userdriven demand.
I'm already aware of installations where IPv6 gets you globally routable connectivity and IPv4 gets you NATted. No mentionable impact on IPv6 traffic. Maybe the p2p vendors should implement IPv6, it might also take a while until RIAA finds them again :-) Pete
Current thread:
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion, (continued)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Stephen Sprunk (Aug 29)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Dave Israel (Aug 29)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Mike Leber (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kevin Oberman (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius (Aug 30)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Jeroen Massar (Aug 30)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Jeroen Massar (Aug 30)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius (Aug 29)
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Marshall Eubanks (Aug 30)
