nanog mailing list archives
Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:18:06 -0500
In a message written on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:44:15PM -0700, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
ARIN announced the fact that it received the 69/8 delegation on August 8th. ARIN received the delegation on August 6th. ARIN made its first allocation/assignment (I don't know which it was, but that isn't important) out of that block on September 19th.
[snip]
Do people have any suggestions for ARIN (and other RIRs) on how they can better dissemenate this information so that people will update their filters?
* One month from filtered to first use is too short. Should be 6
months, with multiple notices. To back this up I can point to
a number of places that stopped all global changes from before
thanksgiving to after christmas. (Not that I support such things.)
* Mailing nanog is nice, but ARIN probably should mail all the ARIN
members, or particularly people with ASN's. Far too many people
view the nanog mailing list as entertainment, rather than
operational necessity.
* Space that goes from "reserved" to "in use" should be test routed
first. Perhaps more of a job for ISI before they turn it over
than ARIN. This allows people to make sure their changes actually
worked.
* Maintain an RADB object of reserved space, so those with automated
tools can easily query it.
* Perhaps offer a BGP feed (multi-hop, a-la RBL) of reserved space to
ARIN members.
If I were in charge it would be:
1) Notify all ARIN members 6 months in advance of the block being used.
At the same time, announce the block from somewhere so people can
check that they do in fact hear it as they open up their filters.
2) Notify people 3 months, 1 month, and 1 week before making the first
allocation.
3) Drop the supernet test on the same day of the first allocation.
4) Listen to feedback from the first few people allocated space
and if it still is not properly routed send out another notice
to people and possibly delay additional allocations from the
block for another month.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Current thread:
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8..., (continued)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Jonathan Disher (Dec 07)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Ralph Doncaster (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... jlewis (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... David Schwartz (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... E.B. Dreger (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Rob Thomas (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Sean Donelan (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Leo Bicknell (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... alex (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Joe Provo (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Joe Abley (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 06)
- HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Rob Thomas (Dec 06)
- Re: HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Sean Donelan (Dec 06)
