nanog mailing list archives

Re: AOL & Cogent

From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 29 Dec 2002 05:56:43 +0000

... trying to even out a perceived inequity ...


peering is a business decision.  if it's possible to force another network
into the role of "customer", then that's seen by many as good business since
revenue increases.  "paid peering" or even "settlements" are not about
inequity, perceived or otherwise; rather, it's about not leaving money on
the table.
-- 
Paul Vixie

Current thread:

AOL & Cogent Andrew Partan (Dec 19)
- RE: AOL & Cogent Deepak Jain (Dec 20)
  - RE: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 20)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Neil J. McRae (Dec 21)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 28)
  - Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 28)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent David Schwartz (Dec 28)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 28)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Mike Leber (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent David Diaz (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent John Kristoff (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Mike Leber (Dec 29)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 30)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent David Diaz (Dec 30)
    - Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen Sprunk (Dec 30)

(Thread continues...)