nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:17:56 -0500
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:38:24 EST, David Charlap <David.Charlap () marconi com> said:
Here's their out against NATs. They are prohibiting use "as an end-point of a non-compast local area network".
Ahh... but the box doing the NAT isn't an end-point, it's a router. ;)
And if they want to argue "but it's also an endpoint for a LAN", they'll
have to figure out how that's any different than a USB or FireWire setup
(after all, those *are* networks too, if you think about it....)
RFC2734 IPv4 over IEEE 1394. P. Johansson. December 1999. (Format:
TXT=69314 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
Slippery slope there.....
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users", (continued)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Chris Adams (Jan 31)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Chris Adams (Jan 31)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" David Charlap (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Jim Shankland (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Jon Mansey (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Eric A. Hall (Feb 01)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Marc Pierrat (Feb 01)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Matthew S. Hallacy (Feb 04)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Dan Hollis (Feb 01)
