Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

["Alexei Roudnev" <alex () relcom EU net>]

Hmm, how can they prove it to _any_ court? They have not right to come in and look
around.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Hollis" <goemon () anime net>
To: "Marc Pierrat" <marc () sunchar com>
Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin () mahtin com>; "Jon Mansey" <jon () interpacket net>;
<nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"


> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> > It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> > spent on this witch hunt.
>
> At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
>
> I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
>
> -Dan
> --
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]