nanog mailing list archives
Re: Satellite latency
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:59:36 -0500
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:17:37 EST, Jim Mercer said:
if you adjust the window size on the sending and receiving systems, you can improve this, but this solution is impractical, as you would need to get everyone on the internet (or at least all of the webservers and websurfers you are servicing) to make adjustments to their local TCP stack. there are 3rd party solutions which can improve the throughput, but even with those, there are still speed of light issues which will cause individual throughput limitations.
RFC1323 support is a 3rd party solution, or does it not solve all the problem
here?
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Satellite latency Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Leo Bicknell (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Brett Frankenberger (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Michael Painter (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Joe Abley (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Tony Hain (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Leo Bicknell (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Satellite latency Rowland, Alan D (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Dickson, Brian (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Simon Lyall (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Chrisy Luke (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Jeb R. Linton (Feb 28)
