nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:00:07 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
July 31st 2002, this list: 2121 Jul 31 Herb Leong ( 4) Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? How quickly we forget. :)
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not any private point-to-point circuits between providers through the same facility.
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Stephen Stuart (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 16)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 16)
- Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Steve Feldman (Nov 17)
- Re: PAIX Petri Helenius (Nov 16)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Jesper Skriver (Nov 17)
- Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Daniel Golding (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
