nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:05:40 -0500
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Ken Chase wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:11:49PM -0500, Jared Mauch's all...Once again, i'd like to see (other than a performance checking customer) generate more than 2Mb/s of icmp.echo and icmp.echo-reply packets that are legit and not part of a DoS. This is quite rare.little blip in the internet, and all your intelligent customers running linux use their leet tools to figure out whats wrong. They all run mtr vs their preferred sites. Mtr generates one ICMP packet (~80 bytes?) of traffic PER hop in the trace. A route of 20+ hops, means 1600 bytes/s per customer (thats 12.8Kbps). 150 customers later you got 2Mbps of traffic (2Mb/s is 2 megaBIT per second right? you didnt mean 2 mega BYTES per second? in which case *8). Is 150 customers a large number? And there are lots of nice graphical traceroute tools for windoze as well of course, dont know their packet load in full operation however. Silly me, sometimes I leave mtrs running. I've found 2-3 going all at once at times. <slap!/> Why is ICMP rate limiting on ECHO and ECHO reply going to stop all DOS attacks? What are they going to do about UDP floods? (Are they proposing
I don't recall saying it will stop all DoS attacks.
It will help minimize them.
Please discontinue imagination. You obviously don't understand how
traceroute works by sending udp packets and getting icmp ttl expired
messages back which are not icmp {echo,echo-reply}. Come back when you do
understand how it works. /sigh
that DDOS attacks are all smurf based? They've just found a solution to 1996's problems? Amazing!)
They're not, but there is still a large amount of things that
just do ping -f <10.2.3.4> and similar types of attacks. If you know
what your usual patterns are, it's easy to notice what is out of
place.
[ hopefully this post makes it to nanog. my posts've been going to /dev/null with previous attempts ] /kcDo your own stats and test your hardware. - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.-- Ken Chase, math () velocet ca * Velocet Communications Inc. * Toronto, CANADA
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks, (continued)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Petri Helenius (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jeff Shultz (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jeff Shultz (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rob Thomas (Oct 29)
- Re: ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rafi Sadowsky (Oct 29)
- Re: ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rob Thomas (Oct 30)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Petri Helenius (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Brett Frankenberger (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Peter E. Fry (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- RE: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks fingers (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks bob (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
