nanog mailing list archives
Re: no ip forged-source-address
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:47:33 +0200
At 01:36 AM 31-10-02 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
It's the difference between: A) Going out to your car at the end of a too-long day and finding a broken taillight. B) Going out to your car at the end of a too-long day and finding a broken taillight and a business card under the windshield wiper that has "Sorry - call me and I'll pay for it" written on the back.
It is better than not having it but we should not get our hopes up that DOS attacks would stop. Remember when 60% of the Internet mail servers were open mail relays? We all thought closing them up would stop spam. Today it is less than 1% but I would say that the amount of spam has not dropped proportionality. See:
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/1014buzz.html for reference. -Hank
Current thread:
- Re: no ip forged-source-address, (continued)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address H. Michael Smith, Jr. (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Charles D Hammonds (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address David Howe (Oct 31)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Sean Donelan (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Hank Nussbacher (Oct 30)
