
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP address fee??
From: David Schwartz <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:06:22 -0700
I think an important question would be what level of service are they buying. Including 255 address with a T3 would be very reasonable, less so with a T1, not very reasonable with DSL, and ridiculous with a dial-up account.
I must be missing something. Why would you expect need for IP addresses to correlate with bandwidth? I can see a company buying a DS3 for a single web/application server or load balancer. I can see an apartment building with 120 network jacks getting a T1. It may make business sense to bundle more 'free IPs' with packages that cost more money. But the actual allocation must be based upon demonstrated need. Read your agreement with ARIN. DS
Current thread:
- Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??], (continued)
- Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??] Peter van Dijk (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? Christopher Schulte (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen Sprunk (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Forrest W. Christian (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Forrest W. Christian (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: IP address fee?? Ted Fischer (Sep 06)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? David Schwartz (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? cw (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)