nanog mailing list archives

RatHole: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings


From: "Al Rowland" <alan_r1 () corp earthlink net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:14:05 -0700


"That [WEB] will give people a false sense of security." IMHO those
'people' are a group that is a subset of folk that will do 'unwise'
things no matter what level of scurity is in place.

Move along, nothing to see here...

Internet != secure, period.

Best regards,
_________________________
Alan Rowland


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Adams
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:51 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings



On Sunday, Sep 22, 2002, at 15:41 US/Pacific, William Allen Simpson 
wrote:
I will agree that the security in WEP is almost useless, and have 
personally campaigned to change it for years.  But, it is still the 
only Access Control widely available.  So, it should be used, in 
addition to the better methods.

That will give people a false sense of security. Wouldn't it be better 
to use an approach like NetReg to give every user a warning when they 
first connect to the network? That doesn't require any arcane software 
config and would give an accurate indication of how secure the network 
is.

Chris



Current thread: